|
Philosophy and Your Future
|
|
Benefits of Philosophical Training |
Philosophy is a discipline requiring skills in reasoning and writing. Thus, the study of philosophy helps a person to develop the abilities to:
- Read texts closely
- Analyze positions critically
- Uncover tacit presuppositions
- Construct cogent arguments, and
- Explain and argue in clear persuasive writing.
These skills are extremely useful in many other disciplines beyond philosophy—and for a range of careers, such as law, computer science, business, medicine, writing, the arts, publishing, and many others. The abilities to write well and to "think outside the box" are in high demand from employers, and will serve students well in their post-college life.
Thus, students who study philosophy need not worry that they may have ruined their chances for "success," in whatever way the word might be understood. The reality is that many people have studied philosophy and gone on to success in a variety of careers, from comedy (Woody Allen, Steve Martin) to business (Carly Fiorina, George Soros) to acting (Harrison Ford, Bruce Lee) to literature (T.S. Eliot, Pearl Buck) to politics (Václav Havel, Bill Clinton) to law (Hon. Stephen Breyer, Hon. David Souter, Hon. Beverly McLachlin) to the arts (Phillip Glass) to journalism (Stone Phillips) to social activism (Martin Luther King, Jr., Elie Wiesel) to sports (John Elway).
|
| back to top |
Graduate School |
For some, the formal study of philosophy does not end with the completion of their undergraduate degrees. A small number of students continue philosophical training at the graduate level.
There are various reasons as to why people choose graduate study in philosophy. For most, graduate study leads to obtaining the professional credentials necessary to teach at the post-secondary level. [1] For others, graduate study in philosophy is a time of career exploration. Still others study philosophy at the graduate level so that they can apply the training to other types of work. [2]
In the next section, we will look at how one should prepare for graduate school, and how they should go about completing the application process.
|
Preparing for Graduate Study |
Undergraduate concentrators considering graduate study in philosophy may have many questions about the nature of graduate study, the various graduate programs, and the application process. How can they learn more?
One way is to attend the meeting held every fall by the Tutorial Office. During this meeting, seniors who are considering graduate schools in philosophy can learn more about the application process, as well as potential programs that would best suit their interests. [3]
Another way is to speak with the Head Tutor, along with any of the graduate students or professors in the department. They can help students:
- Decide as to whether they want to apply
- Discuss possible programs
- Provide advice on how to approach people for recommendations.
- Locate people who have attended, or taught at, schools of potential interest.
In short, students should not hesitate to avail themselves of the counsel and advice offered by the Department when considering graduate school and programs.
Of what does the application process consist? Let us examine this in the following section. |
| back to top |
Application Process: General |
Application deadlines for most programs are typically at the beginning of January. Usually the application requires:
Click on the links above to learn more about the various components of the application process.
Applicants should note that, while each component of the application package is important, the most important parts are the writing sample and the letters of recommendation. It is typically these—and especially the writing sample—on which a final decision to admit will turn. |
Application Process: Transcripts & Coursework |
| Grades |
Solid grades, both in and outside of philosophy, are a critical component of the graduate school application. |
Coursework
|
An undergraduate education that includes a well-rounded general education along with a solid background in philosophy, is strongly recommended for those considering graduate study in philosophy.
Students should also think about taking courses in areas related to their philosophical interests. Government courses for those interested in political philosophy, or psychology courses for those interested in philosophy of mind, would be examples.
|
| Breadth vs. Depth |
The question of breadth vs. depth in course selection is of great importance, given that admissions committees prefer students with a solid undergraduate education in philosophy, i.e., one with a firm grounding in contemporary analytic philosophy, both on the "metaphysics and epistemology" side and on the "moral philosophy" side.
Since there are ways for students to satisfy the concentration's distribution requirements such that they leave holes in their philosophical background, they should consult with the Head Tutor as soon as possible, in order to determine whether they might need to add breadth rather than depth to their course choices. |
| back to Application Process |
Application Process: Statement of Purpose |
| What the statement is |
The statement of purpose is intended to give the Departments to which the student is applying some general information about why s/he wants to go to graduate school and what s/he intends to do once s/he gets there. |
| What the statement should not be |
The statement of purpose is not meant to be:
-
A lengthy autobiographical narrative. [4]
-
An outline of a specific line of research for the dissertation. [5]
|
| What the statement should be
| The statement of purpose should be:
This statement should include:
-
A serious explanation of the student's philosophical interests, as s/he now finds them to be.
-
A reasonable assessment of what the student hopes to accomplish in graduate school.
-
Specific areas of philosophy about which the applicant would like to learn more
-
Specific areas which bear upon the applicant's main areas of interest about which the s/he thinks that s/he needs to know more.
|
| back to Application Process |
Application Process: Letters of Recommendation |
In regards to the letters of recommendation, the best advice is this: develop close professional relationships with at least two of the faculty before the senior year.
Why? The large lecture format that typifies many Harvard undergraduate courses makes it nearly impossible for any faculty member to get to know all of the students. As a result, a professor will have an extremely difficult time writing a cogent, informed letter for a student if that student is only one among many members of some large lecture course.
One excellent means for developing such relationships is by attending professors' office hours. Office hours are excellent times discussing course lecture materials, asking intelligent questions, or reviewing a paper being written for the course. Since office hours are for just such things, students should feel free to make full use of them. Students would perhaps be surprised how often some of the faculty spend their office hours with no one to talk to.
Another way is to attend the various department colloquia and receptions that follow afterwards. |
| back to Application Process |
Application Process: Writing Sample |
The writing sample, though, is perhaps the single most important document you will submit—in the end, it is what will make or break a student's application.
The applicant should view the production of a writing sample as if it were an additional course and plan to devote a fair amount of time just to doing that.
Some questions to consider as you begin to prepare your writing sample: |
From what paper should I draw my writing sample? |
It is, generally, not a good idea to:
-
Merely submit a paper that received an 'A' without revision.
-
Submit a paper that a student is writing for a course taught in the fall of the senior year, given that there is insufficent time to polish the piece for inclusion as a writing sample.
A better idea is to use a successful paper written in the junior year as the foundation for the writing sample, and then spend a good deal of time refining it, whether by:
- Doing additional reading and research on the topic
- Polishing the arguments
- Getting feedback on drafts
-
If the applicant remains unsure of which paper s/he might submit, faculty can help to choose a paper that would be appropriate for a writing sample |
| What should the scope of my writing sample be? |
A good writing sample takes on a substantial philosophical problem, either in a critical evaluation of an argument or in a serious attempt to interpret difficult philosophical texts, rather than being a mere report of what a particular philosopher said.
Applicants should note that admissions committees are looking for promise in the writing sample. In other words, they want to see that the student has a solid basis from which s/he can start learning to do original philosophical work. Hence, students should not worry that the writing sample must make some original contribution to the area about which they are writing. |
| How long should my writing sample be? |
The writing sample needs to be a substantial piece of work. A good rule of thumb is:
-
At least 12-15 pages long, but no more than 40 pages; a rough maximum length would be about 25 pages. Admissions committees generally do not have time to read papers longer than this.
-
The writing sample should be printed on 8.5-inch x 11-inch paper, 1-inch margins, with double-spaced text in a common 12 pt. font, such as Times New Roman.
|
| May I submit more than one sample of writing? |
While it is permissible to submit more than one sample of writing, it is generally not advisable to do so, unless there are compelling reasons, e.g., the student has serious interests both in the philosophy of language and in Aristotle.
Should a student decide to submit more than one sample of work, s/he should indicate which of the pieces is intended to be primary and which is supplemental, in case the committee deems itself unable to read everything. |
| Does my writing sample have to be connected with the area(s) of study that I intend to pursue in graduate school? |
The short answer is no. The writing sample does not have to be connected, in any way, with the area(s) the student thinks s/he most wants to pursue in graduate school.
So long as her or his record shows a sufficient foundation to pursue those areas, a writing sample in some other area might, though it need not, impress the committee as a demonstration of the student's philosophical breadth. |
| How much attention should I pay to mechanics and style? |
Students should be absolutely certain to proof-read thoroughly. Supplement spell- and grammar-checkers with friends reading through the paper and commenting upon style, grammar, and so forth.
Citations should also be in good order, with quotations and footnotes are properly and consistently formatted in one style.
There are many sources about style, grammar, and citation format, and students should consult them frequently while preparing the writing sample.
|
The point of all of this is that the student should want her or his paper to look as if s/he has spent real time with it—and as if s/he is proud of it. Why? The paper needs to be well-written, because being able to write well is an absolutely fundamental prerequisite for graduate study, especially in philosophy. |
[1] Information about job prospects in post-secondary education in general can be found in the Occupational Outlook Handbook, put out by the US Depatment of Labor's Bureau of Labor Statistics. Salary information can be found in The Chronicle of Higher Education (requires Harvard ID and PIN to access.) There is also information available from the American Philosophical Association (APA).
[2] It is not uncommon for students to pursue graduate degress in philosophy to augment "primary" degrees in other fields, for example, to pursue degrees both in law and in philosophy.
[3] Students should note that it is important to get some idea about the various graduate programs, as they vary in their strengths and weaknesses, in their approaches to philosophy, and in the interests of their faculty and students.
[4] Though the statement is not meant to be primarily an autobiography, specific life-experiences which have sparked or sustained a student's interest in the subject may be worth mentioning.
[5] Presenting a narrow focus on a small part of philosophy, rather than on philosophy in general, may be viewed unfavorably by an admissions committee, which is why outlining a specific line of research may hurt the student in the long run. Furthermore, many students find that their interests change dramatically once they are exposed to a wider range of philosophical problems and perspectives in a graduate program.
|
| back to top |