General Education

Starting in September of 2009, the Program in General Education requirements took effect at Harvard College, replacing the Core Curriculum which was in place for more than three decades.

The new program, commonly called Gen Ed, provides a set of liberal arts courses that must be taken in order to graduate. The Class of 2013 was the first to be embraced by the new program, although other undergraduates may elect to follow the requirements.

As Dean Evelynn Hammonds has remarked, Gen Ed is a curriculum about connecting. These new courses bridge the inward intensity of mastering a concentration with the ideas, traditions, and values that will add perspective, ethical grounding, and a sense of civic engagement in life after Harvard.  

Gen Ed courses are quintessential Harvard experiences that draw on the varied resources of the campus and on the innovation and creativity of the faculty.

They are stretching boundaries in the classroom, including enriching forays into intensive research experiences, multimedia projects, collaborative assignments, art-making, and other hands-on learning activities.

This collective investment in a new curriculum has had a ripple effect. It has produced new courses, new practices, new connections, and a new experimental spirit that spills over the confines of the Program in General Education. It is indicative of the fundamental character of Harvard’s approach to undergraduate education – engaged liberal arts that form leaders who, regardless of their path, use knowledge to serve the world.

Below the “lifecycle” of a fictional Gen Ed course is traced, highlighting the program’s innovative approach to course development and providing opportunities for reflection on achievements around the FAS over the past year.

Although it was clear from the annual academic planning  discussions  that her department was eager to mount a new course for the Program in General Education, it was still a surprise to get the call recruiting her to teach a Graduate Seminar in  General Education . These seminars are one springboard from which full-blown Gen Ed courses are launched. With consideration for  tenure  now behind her, Professor Fasge was excited to devote some time to creating a brand new course. This seemed the perfect opportunity. She called a  colleague  at the Harvard Kennedy School, a University Professor with whom she had edited a book last year, and pitched an idea for the course they might co-teach. Together they submitted a formal proposal, which was accepted, and a graduate seminar was added for the fall semester.
The seminar allowed her to bring together graduate students to dig deep into a topic, but that is where the similarities to other courses she had taught ended. Because the focus was course design and development, she was wearing two hats, area expert and teacher. The discussions pushed her to articulate her own approach to pedagogy and to debate that approach with her  students . The discussion was supplemented with access to the academic version of a kid’s sandbox, the Instructional Support Services Team. The  ISST  , which consists of representatives from a range of offices, helped them think about pedagogy and writing, and how they could use technology, the libraries, and museum collections in the course. The resulting course proposal was created to support the aims of a  category  of the General Education program, and to take advantage of the resources of Harvard. The Standing Committee on General Education agreed, and they were off to the races to make their course  trailer  and get the course up and running.
Seeing what was possible was exciting, but acting on those possibilities would take an investment, not just of time but also of  money . The Gen Ed program had access to funds for course development that allowed Professor Fasge to build some of the tools that would make the course really work. Although lectures would be an important part of the course, she and her co-instructor wanted to engage students in hands-on  learning , and have them interact with special guests and ask their own questions. This would give them a head start on their final projects.
The course debuted as a popular shopping week destination, and enrollments were strong. As the instructors had hoped, the final projects were quite innovative, and they decided to share them in a public exhibition with a panel  discussion . As an added bonus, the Gen Ed course, which she continues to co-teach, gave rise to a new and popular departmental course that built on the investment made by the Gen Ed program. Her graduate students from her GSGE became the first set of Teaching Fellows. One even returned as a postdoctoral  fellow  and helped to cover other essential curricular needs in the department.